Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Robert Capa Nowadays

Of all the photographers we study throughout this semester, the ones who captured the dramatic actions and feelings from wars and combats stood out when it comes to the photographic production. Robert Capa belongs to this group and his work was not only relevant for the time his was alive but still contributes to the work of photographers today. The best way to compare the similarities between Capa and today’s photographs is analyzing Capa’s characteristics while capturing the reality and environment he was living in.
Firstly and more comprehensive, Robert Capa was not a fan of static moments; that been said, he always had movements and actions in his work. The picture of Anne Hathaway walking in the streets of New York (from the movie ‘The Devil wears Prada) is a perfect example in which we can see this characteristic of Capa. The action of walking is the main component in the picture and it can be completely perceptible when taking the other elements in the picture in consideration. Such elements are shown kind of blurry, contrasting to the image of the actress herself and so portraying the idea of movement.
The second important aspect regards Robert’s work is defined by Richard Whelan as “…combat photographer…” (Robert Capa: a biography Knopf, 1985). In his photographs, it is noticeable that he captured the moments exactly how they were happening in the battlefields, the actions of the soldiers combating and dying while trying to fight for their lives, which actually differences him from the other photographers of his time. Having that in mind, there is a great influence of Capa on these two other photographs. The first one portrays the Vietnam War, when the Australians were trying to take over that population; the second one portrays the Iraq War and shows the American soldiers in intense conflict against the Iraq soldiers. It is so noticeable the actions, the feelings, and of course the war itself that we can say that the photographer who took these photos was there with the soldiers capturing every single moment; which was one of the biggest characteristics of Capa.
In this same aspect, the famous company Lego made some pictures referring to the notables of photography and one of them was for Robert Capa. In the picture, Lego tried to reproduce the same scene/action of one of the most famous Capa’s work (‘The Falling Soldier’), but in its own Style. This reference makes it more clear the aspect of Capa of capturing the action in the exact moment and how they are really happening. Even in the Lego picture it is noticeable.


The last point but very related with the second one, is also discussed by Richard Whelan when he says that Capa is “…photojournalist who covered different wars…” (Robert Capa: a biography Knopf, 1985). As a photojournalist, Capa captured the moments of wars and combats exactly how they happened and because of that, he didn’t have the intention to make his photographs look artistic but he wanted to show a reality and by publishing it, people would know what really was going on (no repairs). In the next picture we can see what was published in newspapers and make reference to a manifest during the G20. It’s a journalist picture, not artistic and then it shows what was really going on in that time and also makes reference to a combat, major Capa’s characteristic.
The influence of Capa, as well as many other past photographers, have been and will always be a guide to many other photographs. The ‘photography world’ just has to say thanks to have such great exponents.

*Photographs by Roger Capa (discussed or mentioned):




*References
Robert Capa by wikipedia (Online)
Richard Whelan. Robert Capa in Love and War. (WebCT)
Magnum Photos: Robert Capa. WebCT

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Photo Journal 2


Aaron Vincent Elkaim 09/2011 - The star


Peter J Thompson 10/2011 - National Post

The first two photos I’m posting are two examples of press photographs, images captured in order to show the public, through the media, the reality of what is going on in the world. In the first image we can see the occupiers that took over the St James Park on King and Church in a clear manifest of revolt against financial disparities between the social classes. In the same context, the second picture shows the manifest of George Brown employees who were on strike fighting for better work benefits.
I think it is totally unethical and unacceptable to alter press photography. When producing photographs to show reality, the photography has to ‘speak’ for itself and then what was exactly captured has to be published. That moment the picture was taken is crucial for the understanding of the public, what meaning they will absorb from the picture even before reading any description it may have. As Cartier-Bresson, the godfather of photojournalism, says “There’s nothing in this world that does not have a decisive moment”, and add expressing quoted credo: “To me, photography is the simultaneous recognition, in a fraction of a second, of the significance of an event as well as of a precise organization of forms which give that event its proper expression” (Salgado, 1990, p.47).

Joseph Szymanski - San Francisco

Brooke Shaden

The next two pictures I’m posting are examples of art photography. This type of photographs I believe it is acceptable to alter in order to make them more artistic and expand the concept of beauty. The intention of art photography is to express the author artistic point of view, to challenge the reality and some ways distort the reality to deliver a message. Art photography goes beyond reality and imagination and alterations most of time just improve their artistic concepts.
About similarities, I think both art and press photography are produced to catch the public’s attention each one in its own way. They are ways of expression of the raw or distorted reality but always trying to deliver a message. The same photographer who does art, can do press and both of them use them same tool. 


Bibliography:
KerteszCartier-BressonFromShootingTheTruthGordanaIccevska.pdf - on Oct 29, 2009 2:53 PM by Gordana Icevska - WebCt
Reading2.pdf - on Mar 17, 2011 8:19 PM by Gordana Icevska (version 1) - WebCT

Astounding Fine Art Photography By Brooke Shaden. Web. http://smashingpics.in/astounding-fine-art-photography-by-brooke-shaden. Nov 08 2011.

Andrew S Gibson Freelance Writer & Fine Art Photographer Blog. Web. http://www.andrewsgibson.com/blog/2008/08/. Nov 08 2011.


  

Friday, October 7, 2011

My Photo Manipulation!


Manipulating photos has never been an addiction for me. I 
can count the few only times I’ve done that in my life and most of them were pretty much just cropping and pasting. This activity really increased in me the curiosity to keep changing and manipulating my photos.
The first two pictures I picked to make some changes are pictures from back home. I was really happy to pick pictures in which the weather was cloudy, with no energy; but with some touches in contrast, saturation, temperature and highlights, I could see again the beautiful sunny and “full of energy” city I grew up. What makes it even clearer now is the visible tanned skin, lighter sky, the beautiful green of the vegetation and the feeling of “hot temperature” the photo makes you believe it is. 

The second pictures I chose to make some changes ware the logo of the World Cup 2014 that will hold in Brazil. In this picture, in order to promote even more Brazil, all the colors that represent Brazil (according to its flag) are strongly represented in the logo and in a shiner way of view. Also, I found that an also good way to promote is making the name “Brazil” more visible, in a way that when you look the photography you will see this name many times and this will be in your mind for a while (and the strong colors also help in this process). When the world Cup happens, people will relate the event with the name Brazil and also with the colors yellow, blue, green and white.

The last manipulation I decided to make was a collage. Not only a simple one, but a collage using modified pictures, pictures that had already been changed with some effects in order to make them more attractive with less imperfection (saturation, highlights, black and white and contrast). I simply decided to put together pictures of people that are most important for me and also the most beautiful and important places I’ve been. It’s good (especially because I spent months always from them) to put them all together, in a way to make it easier to see all those who I love but I just can see once a year. And also a good tool to remember all those places I’ve already been and I felt in love with.
Next step I’m going to take regarding photo manipulation is going to be learning more about Photoshop and other programs like that. It is awesome how can certain more advanced programs can change people’s body and places. It is also possible to put in the same picture elements of two different pictures in a way that it’s almost impossible to point whether there was manipulation or not. Technology in fact just has helped to photography world and who knows what is going to be the next step! 

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

From Roger Fenton's Combat Photographs to Robert Capa's War Photography

Group Members:
Afroja Akhi , Terry Bint, RaulCalads Ripardo, Stephanie Beausoleil, Yumo Emily Wang

Roger Fenton
Roger Fenton a British photographer was born in 1819 and came from a fairly well off family giving him financial freedom to pursue the arts. Fenton is first reported to have begun with painting and then, began photography in 1852 (History of Photography).

The Crimean War photographs by Fenton taken under pressure were one of the first attempts to systematically document war with photography. Even given the trials inherent with this job, Fenton managed to accumulate 360 photographs in less than 4 months (History of Photography).

Fenton took a very specific approach to taking his war photos. There were no photos of combat, nor other results of war. His photographs were of camps, camaraderie forts, trenches and such. This was total propaganda as an attempt to gain support for the war. He admittedly took some great photo’s, though there were argues, they could not be up to his full artistic potential as he did not have the freedom to express it in his own way (Britain Tate).

As well, in 1854 Fenton began photographing the British Royal Family. He has photographed landscapes, architecture and people of renown. He accomplished a lot in just over ten years of his photography career (Britain Tate).

At the end of the war, his photographs were not of any use as people moved on and forgot Fenton. Photography historians on the other, lament his contribution to photography (History of Photography).

Photographs by Roger Fenton  

Crimean War
            

                           Rievaulx Abbey1854                        

Dome of the Cathedral of the Assumption in the Kremlin, Moscow, 1852


Princesses Helena and Louise, 1856

Alexander Gardener

Alexander Gardener was born in Scotland on October 17, 1821 and then he moved to the United States in 1856. He developed his career and became professional in the United States.  It was in 1851, Hyde Park, London, where he was visiting The Great Exhibition and saw the photography of American Mathew Brady, since then he started to show interest in the field. He is best known for his photographs of the American Civil War, American President Abraham Lincoln and the execution of the conspirators to Lincoln's assassination. He was a Civil War photographer, during the war he became one of the top photographers in the field. As a Civil War photographer, he took around 70 photos of the battlefield two days after the battle. It was the first time of the war had been photographed. He took plenty of photos and a lot of them became very famous. He also took a photo of President Abraham Lincoln and five days later, on April 14, 1856, Lincoln was assassinated. This was one of his famous photos because he took the last photo of him which was historical and remarkable (Encyclopedia, Britannica).


At the early time of his career he worked for photographer Mathew Brady who he admired a lot. Gardener was a quiet dour intelligent man. The photos that he took for the Civil War were all credited to Brady although Gardener wished that he could put his own name as the photographer. He left Brady's studio and set up his own business in 1836 due to the reason of attribution of photographs and copyright. In his career, he photographed parties accused of war crimes during the civil war, including their summary executions (Civil War Trust).
Gardener’s contribution to the world was he let us know what really happened during the Civil War, he used his way to record the historical moments. As there might been conspiracy of some people who may lie about what had happened during the war, but his photos were the vivid evidence that could never lie. All the details about the war were told by his photographs. Gardener used his photos to tell the truth and influence us on what really happened during the war (Encyclopedia, Britannica).
President Abraham Lincoln by Alexander Gardener

The Scaffold during the War captured by Alexander Gardener



Mathew Brady

Mathew Brady was no doubt one of the big icons in the American photography history. Such history of success was built step by step and by Brady himself starting in 1830 when he got in touch with William Page and through Page he met Samuel Morse who showed him the recent and wonderful results of “daguerreotype”.   Brady got fascinated for such technique and began to put into practice everything he learned. Different to most of his contemporaries who were men of little talent, Brady soon stood out and succeeded, always trying to improve in the exhibition of the native things, through constant reading and consults (Encyclopedia, Britannica). Brady was not only characterized by mastery of detail but, always tried to improve his work. One of his first steps on his journey was to photograph the maximum number of important people in that time. In this new direction, he participated in a completion of big promotion in the country and since then was recognized as the “Photographer of Notables”. He has photographed many American presidents with only one exception, Brady has recorded and released a photograph of each one, even being considered “Abraham Lincoln’s favourite photographer” (Morgan, Keya).

Abraham Lincoln by Mathew Brady

The prestige of Brady became even greater when in a trip to London he discovered new techniques and met new photographers who showed him the wet paper technique. He also received one the three awards of a world competition for photographers.
He started to put into practice everything he learned in London and more importantly that he brought with him Alexander Gardner with whom he achieved a new development “Imperial Photography”. In 1858, Brady had his own brand gallery and his name was all over the Country.
However, the peak of his career happened during the Civil War in the USA when he grouped 20 photographers (including Alexander and James Gardner) and then together they photographed “the rough-and-ready life of the road and camp”. Thus, the life of the war American was going though was highly publicized and recorded by Brady and his team. One of the biggest masterpieces of his career was “The photographic History of the Civil War”. In those pictures we see the daily routine of those people who were fighting in the war as well as the normal people. That was also a good tool to promote American army forces in a way they were doing a good job for their people.  Many of the members of the American Army were photographed and also the places the War took place. The returns of the “War Photography” investment weren’t enough as Brady and his photography team invested a lot of money. The big recession which took place in USA made Brady loose all his money and his prestige (Photo Seminars).
Portraits of the War by Mathew Brady




Robert Capa

Born at Andrei Friedman, Budapest in 1913, Robert Capa was a war photographer who used his camera to clearly expose the accurate face of war that overwhelmed so many in this era (Magnum Photos). Wars in that time took place on battle fields and Capa joined the soldiers through combat and kept his camera shooting. War photographers that came before Capa also were witness to what took place on the battle field, but what those photographers showed and how they displayed the visage of war, was a far cry from Capa’s perspective.  Photographs while advancing were still more powerful than first realized, and would become a heavy player in how civilians would view war as well as how much they would support it.  Capa photographed five wars and the First Indochina War, World War II, the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and the Second Sino-Japanese War Spanish Civil War. Capa brought to the world’s door step the horrifying scenes that frequented the battlefield.  There were no sentimental images of soldiers’ comradely or men handsomely posing in uniforms with their rifles amidst a still picturesque horizon, as were the norm before Capa.  Instead, using the photographic technology of his era, Capa shot famous images on the frontline such as this one during the Spanish Civil War, for Life magazine titled “Falling Soldier” taken in Spain at the moment the soldier was shot in the head (In Love & War).  


Robert Capa was a supporter of freelance photography and is famously quoted for saying “If your pictures are not good enough, you’re not close enough.”  Robert Capa will be remembered for many generations as being a more honest purveyor of truth, holding up a mirror rather than a less threatening contrived image of war. True, Capa was close to the frontlines but, was more a leader bringing photo journalism much closer towards the truth. “He was a life-long pacifist who wore military uniforms, rode in tanks, jumped out of planes, dodged bullets and marched in the front lines in order to get a shot” (PBS).
<><><><><> 

Fallen Soldier photographed by Robert Capa

All photographed by Robert Capa during the War



When we compare and contrast all these great photographers of the history, they all have been commonly involved with war photography. They had also shot photos of famous people of their times including Abraham Lincoln and the photos of the British Royal Family. All four of the photographers used art in their photography to capture the war. When we compare the photography by Roger Fenton, Mathew Brady, Alexander Gardener and Robert Capa, the differences that can be found are that Capa had captured shots of actions during the war. Whereas; Fenton, Brady and Gardener were more optimistic as they captured portraits of soldiers in uniforms and campsites during the war. Therefore, many of these photographers were not really considered in taking photos of the war as Capa has shot photos that made people feel the war more closely. There were conspiracies during the different periods of photography that didn’t allow many of these photographers to capture the actual scenes of the war. But, Capa had stepped down and managed to shot photos that truly depicted the war and its outcomes. Robert Capa has shown us the real sides of the war that other artist were not able to depict as Robert Capa had said," If your photographs aren't good enough, you're not close enough." (Magnum Photos).            


Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Photo Journal

The emergency of photography, as well as any other human invention, can be noticed two forces: the need to register a moment for the posterity and the human curiosity to create ‘the new’ and take another step towards the evolution. So much time has passed since the appearance of the first photographic record but we can still find similarities between portraits from the early days and today. In both past and today pictures, there is great artistic expression in a way to use art to represent the reality. Also, both portraits were/are driven by scientific and commercial forces, as stated in the Online Gallery ‘Historic Photographs’, once photograph has always been a tool for discoveries in which has always been invested resources for its development. 
 
On the other hand, the pictures today differ in several aspects from the past. The way pictures are produced are far from being ionized on silver surfaces (like Daguerreotype and others) or even using the Negative. Nowadays the portraits are focused on technology, speed and high quality. In the same aspect, the ease of producing a photo today weakened the high scientific aspect it was closed linked in the past, becoming an artistic record of everyday life of human beings and the world. 
The photographer and subject to be photographed have changed during the years but somewhat still have kept their roots. The photographers in the past were most scientists who wanted to make new discoveries and uncover even more the human nature. The capture of spatial phenomena (e.g. Camera Obscura) and the record of everyday life within the home as well as profile pictures were the main target of their work.
Since evolution requires disassociation, photographers are now each one of us, anyone who wants to register the reality of their own point of view, anyone who sees a photograph not only as a serious and mandatory commitment to record features, but a record of a moment, a story behind a simple image. In the same context, we can say that much of this achievement is due to the technology for been promoting the evolution and development of techniques we got today. It is possible to record any moment, anywhere and anytime. Moreover, we can also ‘change, improve and multiply the moment’. The best of all is that the development of the photography is not going to stop soon. A new way to register the moment will arise and the human curiosity will never disappear.
 


 Raul Ripardo

*Picture from: